SAMPLE
SAMPLE REPORT — For Demonstration Purposes Only
Independent Assessment Report · Tree Risk QTRA
Tree Risk (QTRA)
and Works Assessment
Assessment Site
Yandina-Coolum Road, Coolum Beach QLD 4573
Client: Sunshine Coast Council — Roads and Infrastructure
Document ReferenceTRQ-2025-004 Inspection Date22 April 2025
Client ReferenceSample / Demo Report Date25 April 2025
Assessed ByTree Risk QTRA StatusFinal — Version 1
Trees Assessed9 Site TypeRoad Reserve / Public Infrastructure

This report has been prepared by a QTRA-certified practitioner. Tree Risk QTRA is an independent forestry consultancy — we perform no removal, pruning or other arboricultural works. Our only product is honest, accurate risk advice. This sample report has been produced for demonstration purposes using fictional site data.

1. Executive Summary

A total of 6 trees were assessed at Yandina-Coolum Road, Coolum Beach QLD 4573 on 22 April 2025. The property is an established urban residential allotment with a mixed canopy of native and exotic species. Trees were assessed using the Visual Tree Assessment (VTA) methodology and the Quantified Tree Risk Assessment (QTRA) system.

Arboricultural Value
RatingNo.%
Valuable233%
High117%
Medium117%
Low233%
QTRA Risk Rating
CategoryNo.
Broadly Acceptable5
Tolerable2
Unacceptable2
None0
Works Priority
PriorityNo.
High2
Moderate2
Low3
None2
2. Introduction

Tree Risk QTRA has been engaged by the council Roads and Infrastructure division to undertake a Tree Risk (QTRA) and Works Priority Assessment of nine roadside trees along a rural road corridor. Target occupancy at this site is primarily vehicle traffic with continuous daily use. Statutory road clearance requirements (5.5m vertical) have been assessed for each relevant tree. The assessment was carried out on 22 April 2025 by a QTRA-certified practitioner.

The assessment was carried out on 22 April 2025 by a QTRA-certified practitioner. All trees were assessed individually using the Visual Tree Assessment (VTA) methodology, with risk quantified using the Quantified Tree Risk Assessment (QTRA) system in accordance with QTRA Ltd (2015).

3. Methodology

Subject trees were inspected using the Visual Tree Assessment (VTA) methodology developed by Mattheck and Breloer (1998). Each tree was assessed for species, age class, health, structure, defects, proximity to targets, and arboricultural value. A Quantified Tree Risk Assessment (QTRA) was completed for each tree, producing a Risk of Harm (RoH) value expressed as a probability comparable to accepted tolerability thresholds.

4. Site Observations

The roadside corridor supports a mixed population of native species including Forest Red Gum, Swamp Mahogany, Brush Box and Angophora costata. Two trees (Trees #2 and #6) present Unacceptable risk and require urgent removal — both trees exhibit advanced structural decay with crowns overhanging the live carriageway. Two additional trees (Trees #4 and #9) present Tolerable risk and require moderate priority works within 3 months.

Target occupancy for all trees is assessed as continuous vehicular — primary target is passing vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians. This elevated and continuous target occupancy is the primary driver of risk ratings throughout this assessment and has been incorporated into each QTRA calculation.

5. Conclusions & Recommendations

Of the 9 trees assessed, 2 present Unacceptable risk (Trees #2 and #6) and require immediate removal — the relevant road authority should be notified and traffic management arranged. Two trees present Tolerable risk requiring moderate priority works within 3 months. Four trees require low priority clearance pruning and 2 require no works. All pruning works in the road reserve must be undertaken in accordance with traffic management requirements.

All pruning works should be undertaken by a qualified arborist in accordance with AS 4373-2007 Pruning of Amenity Trees. All retained trees should be re-inspected within a two-year timeframe.

6. Site Map
7. Works Priority Schedule

The following table summarises the assessment findings and recommended works for all trees assessed. Works are prioritised as High (immediate action), Moderate (within 3 months), Low (within 12 months) or None (no works required at this time).

ID Botanic Name Common Name DBH Ht Health Structure Arb Value Risk Category Works Priority Works Required
1 E. tereticornis Forest Red Gum 85cm18m GoodFair Valuable Broadly Acceptable Low Minor deadwood removal
2 E. tereticornis Forest Red Gum 72cm16m FairFair High Broadly Acceptable Low Remove codominant stem
3 Angophora costata Sydney Red Gum 95cm22m GoodGood Valuable Broadly Acceptable None No works — monitor
4 Casuarina cunninghamiana River Sheoak 38cm12m PoorPoor Low Tolerable Moderate Reduction pruning
5 Livistona australis Cabbage Tree Palm 28cm9m GoodGood Medium Broadly Acceptable Low Remove senescent fronds
6 Liquidambar styraciflua Liquidambar 55cm14m FairPoor Low Unacceptable High Removal recommended
8. QTRA Risk Assessment Framework

Quantified Tree Risk Assessment (QTRA) is an internationally recognised tree risk management framework that applies established risk management principles to tree safety. The assessment produces a Risk of Harm (RoH) value — a numerical probability comparable to everyday risk benchmarks.

QTRA ThresholdRisk CategoryAction Required
>1/1,000UnacceptableImmediate action required
1/1,000–1/30,000TolerableWorks within 3 months recommended
<1/1,000,000Broadly AcceptableNo immediate action — monitor and re-inspect
9. Individual Tree Records
Tree #1 —  Eucalyptus tereticornis (Forest Red Gum)LOW PRIORITY
Age ClassMature
DBH74 cm
Height19 m
Spread14 m
OriginNative
HealthGood
StructureFair
ULE25+ yrs
Arb ValueHigh
Risk Index<1/1,000,000
Risk CategoryBroadly Acceptable
Works PriorityLow
Works RequiredClearance pruning — maintain 5.5m vertical clearance over road carriageway. Schedule within 12 months.
Notes: Healthy specimen adjacent to sealed roadway. Lower branches encroaching into the required road clearance envelope — current clearance approximately 4.8m, below the 5.5m minimum required for vehicle clearance. Pruning to maintain statutory clearance is recommended. No structural defects at ground level.
Tree #2 —  Eucalyptus grandis (Flooded Gum)HIGH PRIORITY
Age ClassMature
DBH102 cm
Height28 m
Spread18 m
OriginNative
HealthPoor
StructurePoor
ULE1–3 yrs
Arb ValueLow
Risk Index>1/1,000
Risk CategoryUnacceptable
Works PriorityHigh
Works Required — URGENTRemoval recommended as soon as practicable. Tree overhangs live traffic lane. Notify council road authority. Traffic management required during removal works.
Notes: Significant basal decay confirmed by mallet testing — hollow sound throughout lower 3m of bole. Tree leans toward the carriageway at approximately 8 degrees from vertical. Crown displays extensive stress dieback (approximately 70% canopy loss). The combination of advanced structural failure, lean toward the road and continuous vehicle target occupancy produces an Unacceptable risk rating. The relevant road authority should be notified immediately.
Tree #3 —  Eucalyptus tereticornis (Forest Red Gum)LOW PRIORITY
Age ClassMature
DBH68 cm
Height17 m
Spread13 m
OriginNative
HealthGood
StructureGood
ULE25+ yrs
Arb ValueHigh
Risk Index<1/1,000,000
Risk CategoryBroadly Acceptable
Works PriorityLow
Works RequiredClearance pruning to maintain statutory 5.5m vertical clearance over carriageway. Schedule within 12 months.
Notes: Healthy specimen in good structural condition. Minor branch encroachment into the road clearance envelope on the carriageway side. Clearance pruning is recommended to maintain compliance. No structural defects identified.
Tree #4 —  Casuarina cunninghamiana (River Sheoak)MODERATE PRIORITY
Age ClassSemi-Mature
DBH40 cm
Height13 m
Spread7 m
OriginNative
HealthPoor
StructurePoor
ULE3–5 yrs
Arb ValueLow
Risk Index1/30,000–1/1,000
Risk CategoryTolerable
Works PriorityModerate
Works RequiredRemoval recommended within 3 months given location adjacent to road and declining condition. Traffic management required during removal.
Notes: Significant crown dieback with structural defects at the main stem union. Located within 2m of the sealed road edge. Given the combination of poor structure, declining health and proximity to live traffic, removal is the recommended course of action within 3 months.
Tree #5 —  Lophostemon confertus (Brush Box)NO WORKS
Age ClassMature
DBH86 cm
Height17 m
Spread14 m
OriginNative
HealthGood
StructureGood
ULE25+ yrs
Arb ValueValuable
Risk Index<1/1,000,000
Risk CategoryBroadly Acceptable
Works PriorityNone
Works RequiredNo works required. Clearance verified at 6.2m over carriageway. Re-inspect within 2 years.
Notes: Well-established specimen in excellent condition. Existing road clearance of 6.2m verified — exceeds the statutory minimum. No structural defects. This tree contributes significantly to the roadside canopy and should be retained wherever possible.
Tree #6 —  Melaleuca quinquenervia (Paperbark)HIGH PRIORITY
Age ClassMature
DBH58 cm
Height16 m
Spread10 m
OriginNative
HealthVery Poor
StructurePoor
ULE1–2 yrs
Arb ValueLow
Risk Index>1/1,000
Risk CategoryUnacceptable
Works PriorityHigh
Works Required — URGENTRemoval recommended as soon as practicable. Notify road authority. Traffic management required for safe removal over live carriageway.
Notes: Advanced decay and structural failure throughout. Multiple major dead branches overhanging the carriageway. The main stem exhibits severe basal decay and the crown has lost an estimated 80% of live foliage. Given the location directly over the road and the severity of decline, removal is considered urgent. Road authority notification is recommended.
Tree #7 —  Eucalyptus robusta (Swamp Mahogany)LOW PRIORITY
Age ClassMature
DBH70 cm
Height18 m
Spread13 m
OriginNative
HealthGood
StructureFair
ULE25+ yrs
Arb ValueMedium
Risk Index<1/1,000,000
Risk CategoryBroadly Acceptable
Works PriorityLow
Works RequiredClearance pruning to maintain 5.5m vertical clearance. Deadwood removal from upper canopy. Schedule within 12 months.
Notes: Healthy specimen with fair structure. Minor encroachment of upper branches into road clearance zone. Some deadwood accumulation in the upper crown. Clearance pruning and deadwood removal are recommended within 12 months. No significant structural defects identified at ground level.
Tree #8 —  Corymbia citriodora (Lemon-Scented Gum)NO WORKS
Age ClassMature
DBH54 cm
Height21 m
Spread10 m
OriginNative
HealthGood
StructureGood
ULE25+ yrs
Arb ValueHigh
Risk Index<1/1,000,000
Risk CategoryBroadly Acceptable
Works PriorityNone
Works RequiredNo works required. Road clearance verified at 7.1m. Re-inspect within 2 years.
Notes: Fine specimen in excellent condition with a clean, straight bole. Road clearance of 7.1m verified — well above the statutory minimum. No structural defects or significant deadwood identified. Strongly recommended for retention as part of the roadside tree corridor.
Tree #9 —  Angophora costata (Sydney Red Gum)MODERATE PRIORITY
Age ClassMature
DBH88 cm
Height20 m
Spread17 m
OriginNative
HealthFair
StructurePoor
ULE10–15 yrs
Arb ValueMedium
Risk Index1/30,000–1/1,000
Risk CategoryTolerable
Works PriorityModerate
Works RequiredMajor deadwood removal and crown reduction over carriageway. Undertake within 3 months. Traffic management required.
Notes: Large specimen with significant deadwood accumulation (multiple branches >100mm diameter) overhanging the carriageway. Poor crown structure with several large poorly-attached limbs. The large canopy spread over the road combined with poor structure and significant deadwood places this tree in the Tolerable risk category. Major deadwood removal and crown reduction are required within 3 months. Traffic management will be required for safe works.
Tree Risk QTRA  ·  QTRA Certified Practitioner  ·  treeriskqtra.com.au  ·  [email protected]  ·  Southeast Queenslan