SAMPLE
SAMPLE REPORT — For Demonstration Purposes Only
Independent Assessment Report · Tree Risk QTRA
Tree Risk (QTRA)
and Works Assessment
Assessment Site
3 Morwong Drive, Noosa Heads QLD 4567
Client: Sample Property Owner
Document ReferenceTRQ-2025-001 Inspection Date15 March 2025
Client ReferenceSample / Demo Report Date18 March 2025
Assessed ByTree Risk QTRA StatusFinal — Version 1
Trees Assessed6 Site TypeUrban Residential Property

This report has been prepared by a QTRA-certified practitioner. Tree Risk QTRA is an independent forestry consultancy — we perform no removal, pruning or other arboricultural works. Our only product is honest, accurate risk advice. This sample report has been produced for demonstration purposes using fictional site data.

1. Executive Summary

A total of 6 trees were assessed at 3 Morwong Drive, Noosa Heads QLD 4567 on 15 March 2025. The property is an established urban residential allotment with a mixed canopy of native and exotic species. Trees were assessed using the Visual Tree Assessment (VTA) methodology and the Quantified Tree Risk Assessment (QTRA) system.

Arboricultural Value
RatingNo.%
Valuable233%
High117%
Medium117%
Low233%
QTRA Risk Rating
CategoryNo.
Broadly Acceptable4
Tolerable1
Unacceptable1
None0
Works Priority
PriorityNo.
High1
Moderate1
Low3
None1
2. Introduction

Tree Risk QTRA has been engaged by the property owner to undertake a Tree Risk (QTRA) and Works Priority Assessment of six trees located at the subject property in Noosa Heads, Southeast Queensland. The property is a mature urban residential allotment with an established tree population comprising predominantly native species with some exotic specimens.

The assessment was carried out on 15 March 2025 by a QTRA-certified practitioner. All trees were assessed individually using the Visual Tree Assessment (VTA) methodology, with risk quantified using the Quantified Tree Risk Assessment (QTRA) system in accordance with QTRA Ltd (2015).

3. Methodology

Subject trees were inspected using the Visual Tree Assessment (VTA) methodology developed by Mattheck and Breloer (1998). Each tree was assessed for species, age class, health, structure, defects, proximity to targets, and arboricultural value. A Quantified Tree Risk Assessment (QTRA) was completed for each tree, producing a Risk of Harm (RoH) value expressed as a probability comparable to accepted tolerability thresholds.

4. Site Observations

The site is an established residential property in Noosa Heads with a well-developed canopy of predominantly native species. The tree population includes mature Eucalyptus tereticornis (Forest Red Gum) specimens of significant arboricultural value, a notable Angophora costata in excellent condition, and a Casuarina cunninghamiana in declining health. One exotic specimen (Liquidambar styraciflua) was assessed as presenting an Unacceptable risk due to significant basal decay.

The majority of trees assessed are in good to fair health and present a Broadly Acceptable level of risk. Works recommendations are prioritised accordingly, with one tree requiring urgent attention.

5. Conclusions & Recommendations

Based upon the assessment of the condition and risk associated with the six trees assessed, the following recommendations are provided. One tree (Tree #6, Liquidambar styraciflua) has been assessed as presenting an Unacceptable risk and removal is recommended as soon as practicable. One tree (Tree #4, Casuarina cunninghamiana) presents a Tolerable risk and moderate priority works are recommended within three months. The remaining four trees present a Broadly Acceptable risk level and require low priority works or no works at this time.

All pruning works should be undertaken by a qualified arborist in accordance with AS 4373-2007 Pruning of Amenity Trees. All retained trees should be re-inspected within a two-year timeframe.

6. Site Map
7. Works Priority Schedule

The following table summarises the assessment findings and recommended works for all trees assessed. Works are prioritised as High (immediate action), Moderate (within 3 months), Low (within 12 months) or None (no works required at this time).

ID Botanic Name Common Name DBH Ht Health Structure Arb Value Risk Category Works Priority Works Required
1 E. tereticornis Forest Red Gum 85cm18m GoodFair Valuable Broadly Acceptable Low Minor deadwood removal
2 E. tereticornis Forest Red Gum 72cm16m FairFair High Broadly Acceptable Low Remove codominant stem
3 Angophora costata Sydney Red Gum 95cm22m GoodGood Valuable Broadly Acceptable None No works — monitor
4 Casuarina cunninghamiana River Sheoak 38cm12m PoorPoor Low Tolerable Moderate Reduction pruning
5 Livistona australis Cabbage Tree Palm 28cm9m GoodGood Medium Broadly Acceptable Low Remove senescent fronds
6 Liquidambar styraciflua Liquidambar 55cm14m FairPoor Low Unacceptable High Removal recommended
8. QTRA Risk Assessment Framework

Quantified Tree Risk Assessment (QTRA) is an internationally recognised tree risk management framework that applies established risk management principles to tree safety. The assessment produces a Risk of Harm (RoH) value — a numerical probability comparable to everyday risk benchmarks.

QTRA ThresholdRisk CategoryAction Required
>1/1,000UnacceptableImmediate action required
1/1,000–1/30,000TolerableWorks within 3 months recommended
<1/1,000,000Broadly AcceptableNo immediate action — monitor and re-inspect
9. Individual Tree Records
Tree #1 —  Eucalyptus tereticornis (Forest Red Gum) LOW PRIORITY
Age ClassMature
DBH85 cm
Height18 m
Spread14 m
OriginNative
HealthGood
StructureFair
ULE25+ yrs
Arb ValueValuable
Risk Index<1/1,000,000
Risk CategoryBroadly Acceptable
Works PriorityLow
Works Required Minor deadwood removal from mid-canopy. Schedule within 12 months.
Notes: Minor deadwood present in mid-canopy. Crown otherwise well formed. No structural defects observed at ground level. Significant specimen of high ecological value — retain.
Tree #2 —  Eucalyptus tereticornis (Forest Red Gum) LOW PRIORITY
Age ClassMature
DBH72 cm
Height16 m
Spread12 m
OriginNative
HealthFair
StructureFair
ULE25+ yrs
Arb ValueHigh
Risk Index<1/1,000,000
Risk CategoryBroadly Acceptable
Works PriorityLow
Works Required Remedial pruning — remove co-dominant stem at 4m. Schedule within 12 months.
Notes: Co-dominant stem union with included bark at approximately 4m height. Elevated risk of stem failure at this junction. No decay indicators at ground level. Crown in fair health with minor dieback in secondary branches. Remedial pruning to remove the subordinate co-dominant stem is recommended to reduce the risk of a significant failure event.
Tree #3 —  Angophora costata (Sydney Red Gum) NO WORKS
Age ClassMature
DBH95 cm
Height22 m
Spread18 m
OriginNative
HealthGood
StructureGood
ULE25+ yrs
Arb ValueValuable
Risk Index<1/1,000,000
Risk CategoryBroadly Acceptable
Works PriorityNone
Works Required No works required at this time. Monitor and re-inspect within 2 years.
Notes: Excellent specimen in outstanding condition. Well-formed crown, good health and structure throughout. Significant arboricultural, ecological and amenity value. Strongly recommended for retention.
Tree #4 —  Casuarina cunninghamiana (River Sheoak) MODERATE PRIORITY
Age ClassSemi-Mature
DBH38 cm
Height12 m
Spread6 m
OriginNative
HealthPoor
StructurePoor
ULE5–10 yrs
Arb ValueLow
Risk Index1/30,000–1/1,000
Risk CategoryTolerable
Works PriorityModerate
Works Required Crown reduction pruning to reduce wind loading and sail area. Undertake within 3 months. Reassess condition in 12 months.
Notes: Significant dieback throughout the crown — estimated 40% dead or dying branches. Bark inclusion evident at main stem union increasing risk of structural failure. Root zone shows surface disturbance consistent with past soil compaction. Crown reduction pruning to reduce wind loading is recommended. The tree is assessed as having a limited useful life expectancy of 5–10 years. Monitor closely and consider removal if condition deteriorates further.
Tree #5 —  Livistona australis (Cabbage Tree Palm) LOW PRIORITY
Age ClassMature
DBH28 cm
Height9 m
Spread4 m
OriginNative
HealthGood
StructureGood
ULE25+ yrs
Arb ValueMedium
Risk Index<1/1,000,000
Risk CategoryBroadly Acceptable
Works PriorityLow
Works Required Remove 3 senescent fronds from lower crown. Schedule within 12 months.
Notes: Healthy, well-established specimen with a straight trunk and well-formed crown. Minor senescent frond drop noted in the lower crown — a normal characteristic of the species and not a structural concern. No structural defects identified. The tree contributes positively to the amenity and character of the property and is recommended for retention.
Tree #6 —  Liquidambar styraciflua (Liquidambar) HIGH PRIORITY
Age ClassMature
DBH55 cm
Height14 m
Spread10 m
OriginExotic
HealthFair
StructurePoor
ULE10-15 yrs
Arb ValueLow
Risk Index>1/1,000
Risk CategoryUnacceptable
Works PriorityHigh
Works Required — URGENT Removal recommended as soon as practicable. Significant internal decay confirmed. Risk of whole tree failure is unacceptable. Engage a qualified arborist immediately.
Notes: Significant internal decay at base confirmed by mallet testing and audible sounding. Included bark present at main scaffold union. Crown showing dieback consistent with root and base decline. Assessed as presenting an Unacceptable risk of harm to targets.
Tree Risk QTRA  ·  QTRA Certified Practitioner  ·  treeriskqtra.com.au  ·  [email protected]  ·  Southeast Queenslan